Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 2330729, member: 1992"] My point was unclear then. It was that the DECISION was supposed to be for the betterment of the Broncos not to its detriment. Once upon a time we never considered our team as 'building' rather whoever pulled on the jersey was simply part of THE team. The team was already built so the decision to change what wasn't broken ,was supposed to be for improvement, right ?......it obviously was not made so that we could perform poorly, surely. WB is gone , yes but my comment is about the wisdom of change for change sake and equally, the thinking from a purely business point of view. What motivated such a bizarre choice. Was there a level above and beyond what was already being achieved ? or as I suspect , was it something as mundane as petty jealousy heedless of the damage caused ? [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 35 (members: 0, guests: 35)