Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 2901946, member: 1992"] Last to first. Bird wasn't there when the supplements saga took place so he would only have second hand reports about the medical staff that were employed at that time. I didn't blame Bird, I merely said he could have sought a second opinion if he suspected that club wasn't acting in his best interests. Clearly he didn't feel they weren't doing so. Like the players years before he evidently trusted the medical advice. Whether they would have or not won a premiership 5 years later is total speculation. Your statement was that you accused them of cheating to win a premiership, a claim without any foundation at all. Even had they been banned, that ban would have long been expired and in the year they won they had comprehensive drug testing done. Further, virtually the whole squad was untainted with only two players I believe from that time and even with bans they would have clear to play. Your claim they cheated has no merit and is based on emotion alone. Due to the fact that you believe the punishment didn't fit the crime you unfairly want to accuse a squad of cheating that had nothing to do with the crime . That's not worthy of someone who generally prides himself on evidence and not false beliefs. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)