Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="rnabokov, post: 2607164, member: 1847"] What I like about Granville in the context of this side, particularly as shown in the game last night, was how he creates a different style of play to when Macca is on. For mine, we need them both which is why it's a bit sad he is leaving. Dare I say it, but Granville is the only hooker I would agree justifies a bench hooker position, apart from the fact that I feel he also makes a decent utility back. The good thing last night was the contrasting style of play to Macca's that Granville brought to the team, AND the team adapted to it yet when Macca returned, the side adapted equally well to Macca's style of play. I thought both styles made it hard for the Warriors to read our game. As for disparaging remarks about Macca in the pecking order of hookers, for mine Macca at his best gives our middle solidity and shape, both important factors when your pack needs to control the middle, and his defensive work for the most part is excellent. For the rest of this season, I would keep Granville on the bench as our utility. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 13 (members: 0, guests: 13)