Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="dukey, post: 2308364, member: 2046"] LOL. Okay, just to put it into simple terms that you might be able to understand, let's imagine that homosexuality was still illegal in the years that Ian Roberts was playing. Should his private life and sexual preference be therefore taken into consideration in how he is judged as a player? Would you call him a disgrace in that situation? It's precisely as performance enhancing as Joey's crimes. If you want to bag out Johns, there are plenty of reasons to do so - shit attitude towards refs, completely overrated without the tenuous argument that somehow, his extra-curricular recreational drug use played a role in his on-field performance. I'm of the opinion that he's not even close to being halfback of the century, but he was still a dominant player, and to imply that ecstacy was the reason he was the player he is shows not only a blinding, irrational hatred of Johns, but also a fundamental and hilarious misunderstanding of the nature of the drug itself. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 343 (members: 0, guests: 343)