Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Kooly87, post: 3098569, member: 9326"] I think you're 100% right about the Moses situation leaving everything open to question and putting everyone in potentially awkward situations. That said, I actually didn't mind the Kahu deal in theory and I think if it was handled better, there is actually some merit for this on a wider scale in the NRL. Allowing clubs to take a player's contract on for a season or even part of a season could really help clubs better manage their salary cap situations and stop players from languishing in lower grades on big contracts when other clubs might be able to better use them. In an ideal world, we'd front end other deals with Kahu off our books for the year, and ideally he'd perform well enough that he could win himself a new deal elsewhere. Obviously this didn't work out, but even with him coming back this year, if we made good use of his funds coming off our cap last year, it still could have proven worth it, and that's despite him being constantly busted and his form being generally poor, which is about as bad as the whole deal could really have gone. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 29 (members: 0, guests: 29)