Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Landmark ruling: Jack de Belin barred from NRL return
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="roo-ted, post: 3036997, member: 9464"] No I’m not assuming anything, I’m simply playing out different outcomes. It would be interesting to see your opinion would change if you were accused of something. Innocent until proven guilty is the same law that protects everyone from mob like mentality. The police and the department of public prosecutions usually always start with the most significant charge that they can so there is room for bargain deals if it all falls apart. The prosecutor isn’t overly concerned about convincing someone with the charge they first got put on them, all they care about is a conviction. A conviction goes on their portfolios for further jobs 250 charges 220 convictions ect. This is where the lines get blurred because they don’t care if you are innocent or not they just need that conviction and will offer you a lesser charge to get it [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Landmark ruling: Jack de Belin barred from NRL return
Top