Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Nashy, post: 3040061, member: 1976"] The company is in a position, and acted to remove that problem from their company. I'm actually not sure what your question is. Are you asking me if the police should be held accountable if the company name is dragged through the mud after they keep the employee in a customer facing role? Because that would be on them, hence it's their prerogative to take that person from the front, and sit him down the back until it blows over. I'm certain most people don't know what straw man even means here. Certainly just the latest of BHQ buzzword wank. James roberts was told he couldn't play first grade anymore. He's a professional footballer, he needs to play football to earn good contracts. It's no different with that argument. Players don't determine the position they play at the club. Just like JDB doesn't choose his position in the club. If it's down to the arguments used, ie. One failing to put in, one might be a dirty rapist, the court didn't care, so I struggle to see why we should care about that? [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 16 (members: 0, guests: 16)