Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="tkday, post: 2495481, member: 2229"] Although I like your statements and on the most apart agree with you AP, I really don't think he was claiming to be an Aussie battler, just that he had to spend lots of money on advertising to compete with them. I wouldn't mind him still spending as much, but maybe have a female as the face of the company instead? There's a little bit of a have pitty on me, but certainly not the extent that you claim. Realistically though, how is he supposed to compete with the monopolies of better? TV advertising is probably one of the best ways to get his name out there. Did he over due it? Yep. Should he have put his face out there instead of hiring someone? Probably not. Now he pays the consequences. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)