Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Manly v. NRL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Coxy, post: 2358517, member: 1764"] Tend to agree. Although it should be noted the fine against the club wasn't JUST because of Stewart. It was other behaviour by drunk Manly players at the season launch, including Watmough's foul mouthed attack on a sponsor's daughter. However they do have to answer why Stewart was suspended until his court hearing while Marshall is allowed to play. Sure, sexual assault charge > assault occasioning bodily harm charge, but if they're applying "innocent until proven guilty" on Marshall then it should apply across the board while ever the player in question is not in prison (if it were something serious like a murder or attempted murder charge there's a good chance the player would be remanded and denied bail...) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Manly v. NRL
Top