Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Manly v. NRL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Flutterby, post: 2358836, member: 1853"] In the Manly case, the NRL did not take action in regards to the pending charges - they let the courts deal with it, as they are in the Carney and Marshall cases. The action against Manly as a club and Stewart as a player was in regards to behaviour at the club's official season launch in his official capacity as NRL Face of the Game. Whereas the Carney and Marshall incidents didn't happen at or in relations to any official NRL or club activity but rather in their capacity as "private citizens". So if you want to get down to technicalities the NRL has been consistent. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Manly v. NRL
Top