Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="theshed, post: 2922512, member: 2290"] So a lot of women on my Facebook wall are sharing an article about the villain Matt Lodge and how ball tampering is seen as a bigger issue than abusing women. I won’t link the article because even as someone who leans slightly towards the ‘Lodge shouldn’t be playing’ side of things, I find it teeth grindingly infuriating to read/listen to (there’s an audio discussion attached). I can’t deny that it is a valid point but some of the wording in the article, and in the media discourse of this issue has got me thinking. I’ve noticed that the “terrorising” of the women and child is the major focal point. The fact he king hit a man repeatedly seems to be a side note or secondary consequence of the night in question. I really don’t want to come across as ignorant here so I genuinely am interested in all views but is it fair to find it unreasonable that the assumed emotional distress of women is higher on the social care factor than the actual physical abuse of a man? [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)