Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="mstreet, post: 3272927, member: 11634"] Hate to lose him. Interesting that Bennett built premierships on a powerhouse pack but never paid much for them. TPJ was skyting when Wayne left about getting paid. Hass is on under's as is Kennedy. We threw the bank at Milford and our forwards. What was the thought process? Our forwards will camp outside their 10 and Milford will stroll through when pleased? Our administration is manic. 7 years ago we were blasted for a tiny pack. Pop-gun McGuire leading it. Thaiday partnering Gillet. Parker in 13. Under V'Landy ball, i think they would excel. Small, mobile and aggressive. The on-the-fly rule changes make it difficult to plan. Forwards win games, backs get laid. What kind of forward now? Bullemor looks like the current model. Fast, strong, agile. Asiata 13 is a mobil ball player. Would love a heat seeking defensive missile like Gillet who runs great lines. The point being, we need a vision. What kind of football do we want to play? The limited interchange. Six again it obviously designed to take the power game out. Reynolds is a massive signing. To kick for corners. Holy crap! imagine it... a sly 40/20. WTF!! Someone controlling a 6 again. A Fucking Kicking Game!! P.S. I have a huge soft spot for Lodge as a heavy drinking ****-up that I am. He turned his life around big time. He also has a nasty financial hang over from NY. Poor bastard. Paid heavy for his **** ups. P.s.s.. Milford should accept a train and trial deal in his own interests. He is not the man he or we thought he was. If he could rediscover his passion. His pay check was his downfall. 100k isn't too bad considering average man. He could think of it as investing in himself. Every University student does it. Why not him? What eye's up half doesn't want to partner Reynolds???? [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 133 (members: 0, guests: 133)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now