Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CaptainHook, post: 2658232, member: 8315"] This is a terrific point, Sproj and well worth discussing as I feel this gets glossed over. I mentioned it in another thread that it would be very difficult to improve if you are already the best option. What incentive is there really? I also agree that he looks stagnated. I'm not convinced it's because he's not a good player. Some people just get comfortable if they've been doing the same job for years. Happens in all walks of life. Look at Brent Tate. Arguably became a better player after he left. His tremendous defensive efforts are great, no doubts there. Probably doesn't get mentioned enough when we are on the end of blow-out scores. It's easy to forget the guys that made the tackles. I would sacrifice it though if it meant he was faster and more accurate. Look at Isaac Luke. Suspect defense but easily a better hooker than McCullough. Good point. Can I ask you something? Apart from his defense, which even the worst of the anti-Macca brigade acknowledge is good, what exactly does he bring to the team? You're obviously a big fan of his and I remember you tipped him to have a big year in the predictions thread. I've noticed you're pretty quick to call out negative posts but you rarely seem to offer up any positive points. Is it purely because we don't have a ready-made replacement lined up? If that's not the reason, why is he worth keeping? [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)