Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Midean, post: 3359137, member: 10185"] If Milford is innocent, and there is evidence to back that up, he should be entitled to compensation for losing the Souths contract yes? This was my point earlier, why would that cctv footage have been withheld until now? Also does the cctv catch the entire incident? As Kimlo said, there is a lot of grey area here which we are obviously not privy to. This whole fiasco has not only cost Milford his Souths deal, but tarnished his name and also possibly affected how much he can earn because of the association with violence towards women etc. Also, if the cctv footage is true and clears Milford, what kind of punishment would those girls cop for all this? Not just the assault, but the loss of wages and the reputational damage? edit: As an afterthought, why didn't Milford deny any of the accusations? Usually if someone has serious shit pointed at them, and they didn't do it, they come out swinging defending themselves. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 157 (members: 0, guests: 157)