Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Kimlo, post: 3359141, member: 2021"] The reality is, simply being drunk in public might've been enough grounds for Souths to cancel his contract, it's not at all an implication of innocence or guilt of his criminal charges, and in civil law, it's balance of probability, not proof beyond reasonable doubt so the evidential burden is nowhere near as high. So to answer your last question, probably nothing. If Souths had valid reasons under employment law to cancel his contract, the result of his criminal trial counts for nothing. He can be innocent criminally, but have violated his employment contract. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 325 (members: 0, guests: 325)