Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="WASSHHH, post: 3222462, member: 9424"] You’re right, he is copping it from some. However, I wouldn’t consider what I’ve said to be an unfair line of questioning. That said, the reasons he is copping it are pretty clear too. There is no balance in his assessment / critique. He cherry picks who he wants to criticise and excuses others who he doesn’t - I am not sure how it’s even possible not to have observed this over the last few years. And sure, Milford has shown he can be very good, but he hasn’t been since well before Siebold lobbed up to training. Yet still, no one can provide me an answer as to why some think it’s reasonable that we all just sit around waiting, hoping that Milford somehow gets back to his 2015/16 form. But after 17 games, where Dearden has outperformed Milford in almost every stat, it’s reasonable to criticise the rookie? I guess I just expect far, far more from the [I]superstar[/I] with more than 10 times the games of the bloke who is still going through puberty. I guess I’m also far more reasonable and want to give him time to prove what he (and any other rookie for that matter) can or cannot do. So when I see the hypocrisy and double standards being used to measure their performances, I question it. Whilst I don’t agree, if that’s me “enjoying the sweet sweet sensation of laying the boot into another poster”, then so be it. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 182 (members: 0, guests: 182)