Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Kooly87, post: 3141621, member: 9326"] Sure, they’ve all regressed, but if Milf was as good as you thought he was, he should still Have regressed to be a middling player, instead of comfortably one of our worst/least effective. Statistically speaking he’d currently be Just about the worst Half in the competition, so if he was this supposed gun beforehand, his decline is far greater than those around him. So which one is it? If he was a supposed gun then he’s so totally shit the bed that his decline is above the average of his team mates and therefore obviously not entirely on the Coach. or He was already playing at a pretty inconsistent and mediocre standard prior to Seibold and the decline to outright awful is more in line with everyone else, but also reflective of the fact he didn’t have that high a standard to fall from in the first place? [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 90 (members: 0, guests: 90)