Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 3168939, member: 1992"] I am calm and was calm. So, you got it wrong about my first choice then. My first choice has never been Gentle. My first choice has ALWAYS been Flanagan. I did suggest a way to deal with the ban which involved Gentle doing a 12 month stint as caretaker with Flanagan as assistant for the period before taking over the following season. Suggesting a quick fix to get some spirit back with a trial period is not the same as endorsing KW. I'd prefer Flanagan for 21 whatever way I'd have to arrange it. Gentle ACT as head coach but Flanagan could be the power behind the throne. As for your other claims I'm sure some have a little merit but I believe they'd be taken in KWs stride if he truly wanted the job. If KW can truly coach this current squad are more than capable of beating at least half of the teams out there. It doesn't matter a damn about 22 or 23. It doesn't matter about getting other players in. Why? Because I was talking about a QUICK FIX SOLUTION which can be easily seen from my post. If you told KW he has 21 as a trial, told him this is your player acquisition fund, do you want to give it a lash? He'd probably take it. That's if he really really wants to coach the Broncos. I don't see the insult because everyone including KW knows, KWs a rookie. I reckon he'd be like a seagull on a chip. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 57 (members: 0, guests: 57)