Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="rnabokov, post: 3173264, member: 1847"] I see a problem with this in that, if we have a football "department" headed by a GM of Football - Nolan, to whom the coach answers, then the process of coaching staff selection ought to be one where there is consultation between the two. Unfettered power, anywhere in the chain of command, as I suggested in my post above, can lead to poor outcomes, both in terms of staff choices, and in terms of bypassing systems put in place to avoid that from happening. Conversely, why have a GM Football, where a key responsibility of the position is to oversight recruitment and retention - for mine relating to players AND coaching staff, in consultation with the coach, and taking into account the relevant budget. For example, if a new coach proposes the assistants he wants, then that should be a matter discussed at his job interview. I have a problem where a key player (like the head coach) in a system can make choices without those choices being subject to scrutiny about their quality. I see many of our problems being grounded in decision making without accountability. Separately, for mine, our whole systems around accountability need to be re-visited as well given the criticism the club cops around decision making by the board and CEO. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 20 (members: 0, guests: 20)