Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Coxy, post: 2424270, member: 1764"] This. As much as I don't think the criteria is just, the fact is the criteria does say on field deeds only. However, it does have something about the legacy they've left behind, which to me invariably includes off field status and post-career behaviour/deeds. The whole thing is subjective. If the judges choose to ignore off field issues and focus purely on the ability and achievements on the field, then I don't think anyone could have any qualms with Johns being named. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 7 (members: 0, guests: 7)