Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="subsbligh, post: 2562720, member: 1950"] It's either gonna be 14. Granville or 14. Lowrie If 6,7,9 or 1 go down, it would be handy to have Granville over a second rower filling in in those positions. Also, to my mind Macca's performances have deteriorated in the past years significantly as he fatigues. And I don't think he is that much of an organiser that we miss his presence when off the field. Hunt usually covered that nicely. Surely then, there is no real benefit (but a lot to be lost) by making him play 80 so we can give our already burgeoning second row stocks (each who can easily play 80, in a less importantly bash and tackle role) less minutes. I also think Granville can trouble around the ruck when forwards are tired. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 12 (members: 0, guests: 12)