Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="KingWebcke, post: 2600223, member: 8372"] I think Scott Prince was just an insurance signing. he was available and cheap and provided some good backup in case of injures or in case Wallace reached new depths of hopelessness. Signing Prince had no down side for us really - a decent elder statesmen for a pittance. although I do agree that if Prince hadn't been in the squad I don't think Norman would have shifted to fullback. Hook probably would have kept Norman at 5/8 and gambled on Berryman or Kemp on the wing along with Maranta. I think it was only because we had a good Plan B in the halves that the whole backline switcharoo took place [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)