Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Super Freak, post: 3451554, member: 8536"] [USER=8770]@Wolfie[/USER] [USER=8468]@Cult[/USER] The To'o try in the second half. [MEDIA=imgur]a/djBytdz[/MEDIA] Moses is making no attempt to chase the ball and slide. He makes the decision to tackle Kikau, who is trying to avoid contact, and initiates contact to try and milk a penalty. If he doesn't try to tackle Kikau, he doesn't even get impeded. [ATTACH type="full" alt="vlcsnap-2022-10-03-01h46m54s252.png"]19982[/ATTACH] If he doesn't hang the arm out, Kikau runs straight through the line without issue. It's an obstruction if: [ATTACH type="full" alt="ObstructionRuleSS2.jpg"]19980[/ATTACH] At no point does Kikau initiate contact. It's not an obstruction if: [ATTACH type="full" alt="ObstructionRuleSS.jpg"]19979[/ATTACH] Moses can't have his cake and eat it too. He's made the decision to tackle Kikau, which is a defensive decision. He didn't have to tackle him, he chose to. He can't then claim he's been taken out after making the decision to tackle a player. It does not work that way. As for the "knock on". [MEDIA=imgur]a/z9ILegz[/MEDIA] At which point does this ball go forward? [ATTACH type="full"]19984[/ATTACH] Video and screenshot shows it going towards Panthers try line. People are saying it's a knock on because he's facing Parra's try line, but he's not. [ATTACH type="full" alt="vlcsnap-2022-10-02-20h32m10s434-Recovered.jpg"]19983[/ATTACH] Both of them were correct calls. Channel 9 were adamant they were huge blunders, but it's a very different story on Fox League. But now because of the carry on from Channel 9, there's outrage over what were correct calls. The people that think they're wrong, show me the rule that says Moses is still obstructed despite making the decision to tackle the player. Show me the rule that says Cleary's strip is considered to be a knock on. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now