Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="LittleDavey, post: 3519964, member: 8255"] This gave me a chuckle: ""[I]Mr Brown and I viewed the CCTV footage yesterday at the Bondi Police Station,” Mr Newham said outside court on Wednesday. [B][U]It does not support the notion that on five separate occasions Mr Brown has approached this young woman and with both hands has touched both of her breasts[/U][/B]. It does not support that at this point in time[/I].” So in other words, it may have been four times with both hands. Or four times with both hands and once with one hand. Or four times with one hand and zero with both because the CCTV isn't clear enough. There is so much wiggle room in that statement it's absurd. I do not find it in any way amusing that a young lady was groped without her consent, to be clear. Just the weasel words that are used there make it pretty clear to me there's obviously been some impropriety. He's not come out and said "I did not touch that woman" a-la Bill Clinton. Would tend to indicate he's guilty AF. *I'm not a lawyer [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)