Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Silvertails.net, post: 3532158, member: 13273"] Okay, so change it around a bit. He said he called Carrigan a c@nt not the ref. So Montoya gets 4 for calling a player a derogatory name but Walsh gets 3 because it's directed at the ref. Both words can be interpreted as an insult but one is deemed more powerful by itself (Montoya's) whereas the other is generally preceded by another descriptive term ( Walsh's). Said adjective is generally what makes it more direct and offensive. Walsh got lucky in a way that he just used the simple version, but that also went against him too because there was no specific indicator of who it was directed at plus most teammates wouldn't use that word to each other in a game, might call an opponent one but not a teammate. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)