Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Silvertails.net, post: 3502197, member: 13273"] [st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"][IMG]https://silvertails.net/data/avatars/s/0/2.jpg?1510225571[/IMG][/st_td_row][st_td][B][SIZE=5]Dan[/SIZE][/B] - [SIZE=3]silvertails.net[/SIZE][/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"][SIZE=2][B]JOINED: [/B].July 15, 2004 [B]MESSAGES:[/B] 37,969 [B]Reaction Score: 15,178[/B][/SIZE][/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table][HR][/HR] Mate Alfie Langer and a ton of the other small blokes would have been penalised out of the game under the current rules. I get it that intentionally done at the back of the legs can cause injury, but the ones we saw tonight were mostly natural event of the tackle. If a big bloke runs at me and I try to grab him around the chest, my bulky 82kgs are going to be flung into the air like something out of charlie chaplin or buster keaton and I will end up sitting legs splayed behind his feet. I know you cant rule on intent and asking a referee to understand physics is like getting a dog to understand you don't want to throw a bloody ball, but there has to be something more to it. THe "if someone is injured" idea helps but it opens a can of worms. I fell like it has to be analysed outside realtime and left to match review [HR][/HR][size=3]Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.[/size] [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 357 (members: 0, guests: 357)