Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="NZWarriors.com, post: 3502658, member: 13274"] [st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"][IMG]https://cdn-1b8d.kxcdn.com/data/avatars/s/3/3753.jpg?1599822269[/IMG][/st_td_row][st_td][B][SIZE=5]Dixpat[/SIZE][/B] - [SIZE=3]nzwarriors.com[/SIZE][/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"][SIZE=2][B]JOINED: [/B].February 3, 2014 [B]MESSAGES:[/B] 2,792 [B]REACTIONS: 6,268[/B][/SIZE][/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table][HR][/HR] Whether or not it was a hip drop is immaterial there being no specific charge wording for hip-drop but it is a "tackle" that the NRL has previously decreed that wish to stamp out so as to avoid player injury The charge for Haas is one of Dangerous Contact which is defined in the NRL Judiciary code as Dangerous Contact A Player is guilty of misconduct if he carelessly, recklessly or intentionally makes dangerous contact with an opposing player Accepting that Haas had no intention to injure I'm not sure that any impartial observer would argue that his contact with RCG was not dangerous. [HR][/HR][size=3][/size] [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 41 (members: 0, guests: 41)