Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Light Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
NRL 2023 Rule Amendments
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Big Pete, post: 3465914, member: 1899"] It's going to be very interesting to see the impact this has on defence. With only one call, the ruck should be even faster giving teams with possession a bigger advantage. Further, the requirement to have both feet in line with the referee is going to make it difficult for the defensive line to assert pressure, especially on their goal-line where defenders are already pushing the officials. I can't help but look at the grounding rule cynically. For mine, it's only coming in due to the media backlash that followed the Gagai no-try against the Broncos. Why wasn't this addressed when they retroactively revealed the Staggs try should have been a No-Try against South Sydney way back in Round 2 2020? Similarly, the captain's challenge amendment appears to be a response to the Cowboys-Tigers game. I believe the NRL argued that the official had not called full-time and only blew a soft whistle. As far as I can tell, that review would still be allowed under these rules. 10m penalties are discretionary? For whom? Penrith? Cowboys? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
NRL 2023 Rule Amendments
Top