Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Big Pete, post: 2806398, member: 1899"] I get why, but just because he was a constant member of the 17 doesn't mean he'll be a 'big loss' for the club. In fact, the club could be better off for losing him and giving another player like a Brodie Croft or Jake Turpin a shot. It's just one of those quirks that pops up every now and then when people get greedy and throw in an extra player to make the situation sound more severe than it really is. Instead of nodding along, I feel like slamming the brakes and being like wait, is this player really that big a loss? Essentially it loses it's potency and creates silly tangents like this. Otherwise, yeah Melbourne could struggle. Ordinarily if any other team was in the Storm's situation I'd have them 0-2 but let's face it, it's Melbourne. They've got enough class there in Bromwich, Smith, Cronk and Chambers to conjure up points and I'm sure they'll pluck some rookie like Stimson from their ranks and he'll do the job for them. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)