Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
NRL Judiciary
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="The Brizz, post: 2441451, member: 1817"] Which one is worse? [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwV1z0BzTnY[/url] OR [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUXFfNR_sBQ[/url] I know the second one in its own right is bad but how on Earth does the NRL judiciary justify Prior getting 5 weeks for an intentional elbow to the side of the face of an opponent who is passing the ball so at worst should expect a bit of a bump rather than a full tackle or in this case a cocked elbow. On the other hand Travis Burns intentionally jumps up and whacks a guy aggressively with a swinging forearm, clearly will never do the same amount of damage and clearly no where near as dangerous or potentially damaging. I just cannot fathom how Prior gets 3 times less than Travis Burns, he clearly IMO should have got more. The system is obviously stuffed and the whole shoulder charge-gate is another example there have been a flurry of chances for them to set a bench mark and then use that bench mark to punish the others instead we get inconsistent punishments like Vatuvei getting off Pritchard gets 1 week, Te'o gets 4 downgraded to 2 and Inglis gets 5? Seriously the whole system is stuffed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
NRL Judiciary
Top