Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 2694082, member: 1992"] No, the part I wrote about. You know, the plain English words I wrote down so you wouldn't be confused as to what I was referring to. The part where you stated you didn't state anything as fact. That you judged them guilty was evident and not in dispute . I have never thought that someone is not entitled to having a different view on fitting punishment. What I despise is snap judgement without knowing the facts , people who readily believe anything and everything provided it is negative and about someone or something they dislike. A club, a player, a coach etc. I do not think asking for a ban (like a year or two) that one would reserve for a truly serious offence should be considered here. With regard to knee jerk, reactionary and hysterical demands for the players heads on a pike I say, there is a reason why governing bodies do not rush to decisions. It's so the offence can be considered coolly and without emotion coursing through the system. That's all I ever was asking for posters to think about. Step back, take a breath is the wise thing to do. Personally, abusing the referee is pretty shithouse and sets a poor example and like most would agree ,should be stamped out. Making some boofhead forward accountable and punishable for all the abusers is obviously wrong. Unlike Harrigan ( arrogant prick ) they should not be made an example of. They should be judged on the merit of this single incident. Punishing one for the sins of the multitude is archaic ( no surprise where that thought process has its roots !) [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now