Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="abashii, post: 2695528, member: 8686"] I see where you're coming from but no, that would be a terrible idea. We'll set aside for the moment all the issues involved with the NRL being given access to confidential, untried evidence being compiled for the case before it is used in court and assume that they have appropriate personnel available to test conflicting claims and make a reasoned decision. Imagine if the NRL reviewed all the facts and stood the bloke down. Do you think that may be prejudicial and possibly have an impact on his pending court case? What about if he was allowed to keep playing? You don't want to end up in a situation where the judgement of a rugby league authority is taken as a proxy for that of an actual court. Once the facts have been established in an actual court then the league can then act properly in determining what, if any, sanction needs to be applied. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 235 (members: 0, guests: 235)