Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 2709758, member: 1992"] Serious ? You're not suggesting we take Earls word for it but reject the Sharks claim they didn't know ! Can't have it both ways I'm afraid. I actually don't know what the Sharks said to investigators nor do I know what Earl said or claimed. I do know that both parties were interviewed and two bodies investigated all the available evidence. Like I wrote earlier, it's over and any anger should be directed at those that decided the penalties. I also don't know for a fact that the Sharks were told not to tell anyone. Perhaps they were, I just don't know that. I didn't read every thing written about them as I know for a fact that we are often spoon fed information that suits and frequently relevant facts are conveniently left out or deliberately omitted because they don't suit the writers view. On on the face of it ,it does appear Earl has been harshly treated but he has the right to have these things appealed or revisited . I think if I knew everything there is to know I could form a reasoned view and I think that's true for most of us. What we all should remember though is that these events occurred four years ago, they have been dealt with by an independent body, ASADA and that there are only three players from that time still in the NRL. It's not a whole team or a big number. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)