Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Big Pete, post: 2709764, member: 1899"] I don't know, I was never interested in what the better report was, what I was interested in was providing members with some information that I found compelling. Information that for all intents and purposes could have been included in the report for all we know, but we don't because none of us have seen it. I thought maybe you had since I know your stance on evidence but it appears I was wrong to think you knew the facts the report had established. It's still a very fascinating insight into the case, with oral testimonies provided by those who were much closer to the situation than anybody on this board as well as some evidence to support their investigation. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 313 (members: 0, guests: 313)