Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Morkel, post: 2709767, member: 8215"] Precisely, you can't have it both ways, which is why both Earl and the Sharks players both equally had grounds to suspect it was not above board. As for your claim of Earl distributing and selling PEDs, you were absolutely incorrect. For someone so besotted with truth vs innuendo, it amazes me that you're arguing about something that you admit you have not researched fully, at least in terms of what's publicly available. Regardless of whether the articles are skewed towards a certain agenda, certainly someone as wise as you can cut through the BS and extract the facts? My main bugbear remains this: The NRL made it very clear that it would show leniency with those who told the truth, and punish those who deliberately withheld information. Instead, we have Earl, who spilled his guts, cop a huge bag, and the Sharks, who puckered up, get banned for literally a handful of NRL games. For mine, the only person out of this who can hold their head high is Earl. He admitted his mistakes, he was honest, and he co-operated to his full ability. The Sharks, the players and staff included, can go get fucked. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 20 (members: 0, guests: 20)