Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Light Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
NRL Players and family members in hot water
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Renegade, post: 2833567, member: 1928"] I don't have a problem with this, but make it reasonable from both ends. Realistically, a punishment should have multiple tiers each one increasing in severity, and yes ultimately there does need to be a "banned for 2 years" whatever punishment at the end. But really, the focus should be on the rehab part. Not only does it look good from a code perspective "more interested in rehabbing the person than handing out punishments" but it helps the person which should be the first aim, not "protecting your brand". Technically speaking they're the same right? They're illegal drugs therefore they must be banded together under the one umbrella? Otherwise you are at the precipice of making concessions based on certain drugs, and if you start doing that, well, welcome to the team lol. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
NRL Players and family members in hot water
Top