Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Midean, post: 3139000, member: 10185"] Actually, by the letter of workplace law, it is on jacks side, regardless of the case he lost to sue the NRL over the stand down policy. If he is found not guilty, the NRL will have no chance if he decides to sue them. It will be incredibly easy for him to sue for damages and win based on current workplace laws regardless of the NRLs stand down policy, that was only implemented after he was charged. Remember, the stand down policy is the NRL stance, not workplace law, and Jack has been denied his right to work before going to trial. A cashed up organization vs a player was never gonig to see Jack win the initial case while the matter was still in court, but be damn sure if he is found innocent, then it will be a bad day for the NRL's back account. There is not a lawyer in the country that would lose that case, a retrospective rule brought in after the fact? Thats an easy win every day of the week and any lawyer worth his salt will make it look easy. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 241 (members: 0, guests: 241)