Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Anonymous person, post: 2453694, member: 2115"] benefit of the doubt.......it explains itself. they define things like "Knock on" because its a rugby league term. in describing knock-on they dont then go and define the word "forward" do they? no, because its an every day word/term. same goes for benefit of the doubt. the rule says that benefit of the doubt goes to the attacking team. that in itself is the rule. what do you want them to do, define the word "benefit"? or is it "doubt" that youre having trouble with? "benefit of the doubt" doesnt need to be defined because it is already defined in the english language. if the rule is not defined anywhere then it cant be enforced, so like i said, get the old pen and paper out and let the NRL know theyre incorrectly officiating. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)