Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Kooly87, post: 3119307, member: 9326"] You have to weigh up the greater good in things like this though. If the NRL can demonstrate a way to operate in total isolation and keep the safety of their employees at the forefront of everything they do, then yes, there would still be a very small level of risk of infection, but the reality is that these are healthy young men who have a negligible risk of serious complications, and virtually no chance of spreading it outside their playing group if they have been correctly isolated. Then the payoff for taking this very small and calculated risk is that it provides significant entertainment value for a large number of people who have already been locked down for several weeks and will no doubt be reaching a tipping point for many in how they are handling this level of isolation. If NRL being played and broadcast can help encourage a significant number of people to both stay at home, as well as cope better when they are home, then you might find the very small level of risk is justified in the potential reward. The Romans certainly knew the value of keeping the population fed and entertained, and in this day and age it really is still no different. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)