Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Big Pete, post: 3469484, member: 1899"] Imagine if the 2007 Grand Final was played under modern interpretations. Crocker would have been sent and Billy would have been lucky to stay on the field. The crazy thing was, we just accepted it and the only fans who were upset were Manly - understandably so. I can't remember what the obstruction interpretation was at the time. I remember it had to be fairly blatant with the opposition player hitting the deck and the player taking advantage of that space. Then they had a crackdown that everyone hated to start 2007 and we forgot about it until Hodges scored a controversial try in the 2012 decider. Try or no try? I'd say no try, but the officials have been extremely lenient in this department before. Two Brisbane players involved, Brisbane were by far the biggest beneficiaries of obstruction calls last year... TRY - Benefit of the Doubt They can have the chicken! [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 11 (members: 0, guests: 11)