NRL to introduce salary cap on off-field spending in 2017

GCBRONCO

International Captain
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
22,559
Reaction score
21,002
NRL to introduce salary cap on off-field spending in 2017

The NRL will introduce a limit on football club spending next year in the biggest club equalisation measure since the establishment of a salary cap.
The governing body and its clubs are in the process of signing off on a whole-of-game funding agreement that effectively extinguishes any threat of a Super League-style breakaway competition. Rugby League Central has sent all clubs a copy of the memorandum of understanding which, when signed, will become a binding agreement that secures their financial future and holds them to a perpetual license to play in the NRL competition.

It's understood the document - obtained by Fairfax Media - has been signed off by a number of clubs. Others are expected to do likewise to qualify for the promised up-front payment of $1.125 million each in early July, made possible by the record broadcast deal. The clubs stand to earn an additional $100 million from 2018 to 2022, with additional grants totalling 130 per cent of player payments over that period.Head office is keen to ensure its franchises don't squander those funds, while also seeking to create an even playing field by controlling off-field expenditure. To that end, for the first time there will be a ceiling on the amount of money spent on football departments from 2017.The cap will likely apply to the dollars spent on the head coach and his staff, sports science, high-performance units, study trips and other means of achieving an off-field edge. There is a discrepancy of about $10 million between what the richest and poorest clubs spend off the field, with the new cap to bridge the gap.
"The parties will form a working group consisting of both ARLC and NRL club representatives with the express mandate to research and develop a football department cap system by no later than 31 October 2016," the agreement states.
"The terms of reference of this [six-person] working group will include development of the protocols for calculating football department expenses, cap limits and rules, reporting of information, compliance monitoring processes and penalties for non-compliance. An agreed process for capping football department expenses will be incorporated in the New Club Licence."
The AFL introduced an "equalisation tax" two years ago after confirming there is a correlation between football department spending and success on the field. Exactly how it is applied in the NRL remains to be determined, with rigorous debate sure to ensue before a figure is settled upon.
Brisbane and Melbourne are among the biggest-spending clubs off the field, paying head coaches Wayne Bennett and Craig Bellamy seven-figure sums. Wests Tigers, Gold Coast and Newcastle - the clubs that have gone cap-in-hand to the NRL for financial assistance - spend just a fraction of the amount on staff and facilities.
Another contentious issue is the NRL's move to remove ratchet clauses from player contracts. While the clubs and the League are aligned on the issue, the move puts them on a collision course with the Rugby League Players' Association. With the salary cap yet to be set for 2018 and beyond, most star players and their managers are holding off on a decision or asking for pay rises commensurate with any salary cap increases. The RLPA wants ratchet clauses to remain but the MOU states they are to be abolished, with a separate working party to be formed to oversee the drafting of a new collective bargaining agreement with the players.
"As a first step, ARLC and NRL clubs will agree a whole of game position regarding the use of ratchet style clauses in player contracts which they shall jointly and immediately take to the RLPA for approval," the document states.
Another working party will be formed by June 30 to focus on the issue of 'centralised stadia and match placement' for Sydney clubs. It's understood the NRL won't be able to dictate to clubs where to play matches, although several want clarification on the issue before signing off on the agreement.


 
So well run clubs like the Broncos, Roosters, Souths, Cows, Sharks (recently), and Melbourne have to be punished because of how idiots on the boards of Manly, Tigers, and the GC squander their cash like third graders using Candy Crush?
 
It's a stupid idea. One, because it is supposed to favour the clubs that can't sort their finances out, and two, because it won't work. The NRL can't keep a handle on something as simple as players getting paid black money. How the **** are they going to investigate and audit things like "sports science" and "high performance units"? How many millions is the NRL going to pay high-priced auditors and investigators to watch over, that could be going to better things, like, I don't know, grassroots footy so our talent pool doesn't try up?

The NRL will be better off letting two or three clubs die a natural death, then constantly trying to nobble the better ones down to the lowest common denominator.
 
Such a stupid idea.

If they wanted to make it even provide more grants to the shit clubs, don't limit off-field spending of the better clubs.
 
I just don't understand it. Why can't they make it simple. Licence stipulates you need X money, and you don't, so now your licence will be given to another bid who can satisfy the licence conditions.
 
I just don't understand it. Why can't they make it simple. Licence stipulates you need X money, and you don't, so now your licence will be given to another bid who can satisfy the licence conditions.

Pretty much this.
 
I'm just going to like every post in this thread because we all know that as always, the NRL has made another stupid, narrow-minded, amateurish decision.
 
the NRL must be the only sporting competition in the world (or business for that matter) that is determined to drag the most successful clubs down to the level of the struggling clubs instead of the other way around.

that is why i never had a problem with a businessman like Smith running the comp. you don't need a rugby league guy to do it ... most of them (although not all) are from the old school. you need to keep teams alive, and if it means punishing the teams that are successful both on and off the field, then so be it.

yes, you need expert rugby league people top determine rules etc.

but salary caps and off-field spending caps etc, should be determined at arms length. and an outsider is perfect for that as they'll do what is in the best interests of the business.

Rugby League is one of the best products in the Australian sporting landscape ... but it won't remain that way if we keep letting incompetents and amateurs run things so the most successful teams are dragged down to the level of the cellar-dwellers.
 
ps ... I really hope a team like the Broncos challenges this in court and has it ruled an illegal restraint of trade (which is highly likely) and if that happens it won't be long before someone challenges the salary cap and has that abolished ... then how stupid are the NRL going to look
 
the NRL must be the only sporting competition in the world (or business for that matter) that is determined to drag the most successful clubs down to the level of the struggling clubs instead of the other way around.

that is why i never had a problem with a businessman like Smith running the comp. you don't need a rugby league guy to do it ... most of them (although not all) are from the old school. you need to keep teams alive, and if it means punishing the teams that are successful both on and off the field, then so be it.

yes, you need expert rugby league people top determine rules etc.

but salary caps and off-field spending caps etc, should be determined at arms length. and an outsider is perfect for that as they'll do what is in the best interests of the business.

Rugby League is one of the best products in the Australian sporting landscape ... but it won't remain that way if we keep letting incompetents and amateurs run things so the most successful teams are dragged down to the level of the cellar-dwellers.

I still remember that growing up, the ARL was the hottest footy code in Aus, especially the northern states. These days, it has fallen WELL behind the AFL and probably on level national terms with the A-League. The A-League for goodness sake! It is just lucky Rugby is run even worse.
 
ps ... I really hope a team like the Broncos challenges this in court and has it ruled an illegal restraint of trade (which is highly likely) and if that happens it won't be long before someone challenges the salary cap and has that abolished ... then how stupid are the NRL going to look

And I so hope that happens because the NRL will actually move forward then through their own incompetence and it would be so pleasing to see.
 
I can't believe how amateur this mob is. Instead of aiming for sixteen self sufficient profit making clubs, they want sixteen broke clubs who leech off the NRL just to survive. Madness.
 
I just don't understand it. Why can't they make it simple. Licence stipulates you need X money, and you don't, so now your licence will be given to another bid who can satisfy the licence conditions.

They tried that, that's why George Piggins is a name that we all know.

I'm sure our club admins will have a way around this BS before we sign up.
 
Reports on news.com saying Hasler and Bellamy are the first two voices against it as it is effectively telling the clubs how to run their own business. That is exactly right and it's a stupid idea. It's too stupid to happen and since it's the NRL, too stupid to happen is exactly what they deal in. This will happen.
 
So well run clubs like the Broncos, Roosters, Souths, Cows, Sharks (recently), and Melbourne have to be punished because of how idiots on the boards of Manly, Tigers, and the GC squander their cash like third graders using Candy Crush?

Welcome to the NRL.
 

Active Now

No members online now.
Top