Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Organix, post: 3529645, member: 8187"] I just saw it as a great chance for a laugh. The banter throughout was hilarious, and the NRL is just ludicrous in how they try to look so professional, but make a mockery of everything they are trying to emulate. It's the same with the journalists who act as though they are there doing investigative journalism of the highest order and commenting with authority on social issues hoping to win some kind of Walkley Award. It's actually hilarious, and I've no doubt it is done in all seriousness and unironically too. The case was "contrary conduct" and they wasted over 4 hours trying to prove Walsh swore at the ref, rather than his general conduct, only to be completely unable to prove it and then saying "we can't prove it, and the evidence provided is pointing against it, but I know you did it, so you're guilty anyway". Like, imagine if that were a spoof of 12 Angry Men. You can't write this shit because it wouldn't be as hilarious as what we just witnessed. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 43 (members: 0, guests: 43)