Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Allo, post: 3332073, member: 8190"] between the Diehards and the Panthers there’s about 12-13 NRLW contracted players so far plus a fair few more that played age rep this year. Seems a good way to disenfranchise a lot of players, particularly one of the largest growth areas being young women, by axing their clubs almost immediately after they formed. both sides showed they were more than capable of being competitive being minor premiers and 4th, so why would you kill two successful clubs just to shoehorn in a Souths Logan team that pulled out this year because they had no players and a Norths side that didn’t have one in the first place? It smacks of arrogance from the QRL (shock!) who should’ve taken notice of the NRLW girls saying “lol get fucked” when the notion of talent dispersion was a headline for the next NRLW season. Why would they think the state comp, and in particular someone as passionate and steadfast and important as Ali, would be any different when being told they’ll have to play for a new club? [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 22 (members: 0, guests: 22)