Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Anonymous person, post: 2483754, member: 2115"] [b]Re: Gillett and Jack Reed re-sign[/b] and both were 2 of the worst players in the competition for most of 2012. playing for england isnt really a big deal, he was selected after his debut year - theyll take any NRL player that can play for them. yes gillett plays origin, but he was ridiculously out of his depth in it and was a huge liability. and just because some other team pays too much for someone doesnt mean us overpaying someone is a bargain. just because thurston gets a million it doesnt mean wallace for $500k is a bargain. btw i posted like 2 weeks ago that they offered reed 250k a season, with a link backing it up, so his $250k a year is no surprise. ill say something negative because i think its too much money for what those players have shown/produced. "they are only going to get better"......where have i heard that before. oh i know, when we signed wallace for $250k+. then again for $300k. then again for $350k+. still waiting on that "getting better". still waiting on it for reed and gillett too. reeds in his 3rd year, gillett in his 4th. cant wait too much longer and pay too much more money for them to get better. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 15 (members: 0, guests: 15)