Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="papabear, post: 2548011, member: 8480"] - how is it known that Milford wouldn't have resigned with the raiders with out that clause, that is not known fact that is speculation. Be reasonable here. - I haven't heard that frm Milford's parents but ok. - less money under the cap. every man and his dog knows that he is going to be fixed up with the third party deals which the broncos can offer that the raiders can't. Not having a dig at the broncs for doing it , I wish the raiders could. But let's not be naive. - Fergo played great in his last games for us, I liked carney at the end too. If your pointing out that Milford doesn't have disciplinary issues, you only need to look at Gagai before you think of glass houses. Though I agree that we are in the poopoo in this regard, the question is whether broncs should be slinging it at us. - I'm sure there is lots of proof, but I agree that no one here has it. Who really cares about that garbage anyways. point is don't preface a post with known facts and then fill it with opinion. again the raiders look fine, news limited is having a fair dig, but they own the broncos and what milf for 2014, so their opinion on the subject is hardly valid. in fact if you want to look at reputation having your club being owned by a company that writes negative stuff on the game and other club does a lot more damage to the reputation of any club or rugby league then a little too and fro over Milford. afgntk - I highly respect his opinion, IMO he is valued at thegh, just becoz a few of the noisy people don't like hearing some of the stuff he has to say because it challenges their view on things doesn't change his stature at thegh. I am sure all clubs forums could do with blokes like him. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 266 (members: 0, guests: 266)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now