Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Porthoz, post: 2548029, member: 2221"] At the time it was certainly mentioned, and again at the start of this whole saga. Why do you think the clause is there in the first place? Just because you don't want to believe it, doesn't make it true! Oh, you haven't heard. In that case, I'm sorry... It mustn't be true. :rolleyes: Now, that is assumption, not fact. I'm only going with what has been published and is verifiable. This is not about slinging anything, it's about the FACT that Carney, Dugan and Fergo's behavior towards the club was far worse than what Anthony has ever done, but he's the one the Raiders chose to make an example from. As to glass roofs mate, no one can seriously compete with Canberra. From Carney's antics, passing by Monaghan's dog, Dugan's cruisers to Fergo's disappearance, you almost have a monopoly! So I'm the one accused of posting opinions instead of facts uh? LOL At least I can back up each and everyone of my statements with verifiable sources, what are yours, if not speculation? I wasn't talking about what the Courier Mail or Canberra Times write, albeit they will certainly have some influence. It's about the image that the Raiders will have to the general League community and its stake holders. Another thing I am curious about, given the form of Don Furner with player contracts (remember Dayne Weston?), let's see what other players, especially those from the same background as Milford will think of all this... I don't know afgntk, but he seems to think for himself, not just tow the "party line", in the same way Worm does. In FACT, most of the Raiders fans on BHQ seem to have a semblance of a brain, even if some are a little deluded! :aetsch: [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 15 (members: 0, guests: 15)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now