Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Porthoz, post: 2549101, member: 2221"] Part of the problem at the GH is the total censure. No other opinions are tolerated, and that GE dickhead prances about banning anything that remotely smells like the Broncos, because god forbid a sane discussion could arise! If some sense is indeed crawling back in there, GE's mum probably cut his internet... I'm glad we give Raiders fans the chance to present their point of view here, as far fetched as it may look through our maroon coloured glasses. It's refreshing and makes us reflect on the merit of their claims, regardless of whether they are absurd or not. Honestly, I understand why the Raiders are doing what they are doing. I understand why Raiders fans are blowing up. But they are taking it out on the wrong kid, because they have been burned by Carney, Dugan and Fergo, while the NRL stood by watching (okay, not in Carney's case). Milford wants to go home, is homesick, wants to be with his family and has a clause that at the very least indicates this is not something new, or that the Broncos incited him to break contract. They had no qualms taking Sticky for the same reason, but hey, that's ok cuz his clause was better worded! On the Hoffman case, although there is a thread for that... sincerely if he is unhappy, make a deal with the Dogs. I don't think that not getting the spot you want in the team is reason to break contract, but I honestly rather have Maranta bombing tries than a poisonous w(h)inger in the sheds, just because he isn't man enough to knuckle down and claim the fullback spot the only way he should: Proving he is better than the rest! Besides, it suits the Broncos to have a weak link in a team coached by Dessie... [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 261 (members: 0, guests: 261)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now