Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="papabear, post: 2549443, member: 8480"] I think we are arguing over the semantics of the word "activated". If the circumstances are such that one can use a clause ala ricky stuart and one activates thats clause they are free to sign with another club. If the circumstances in milfords are such were he can legitimately activate the clause, then it shouoldnt matter what canberra raiders threaten, he shouold be free to sign with the broncos? So why hasn't he? might I suggest that the clause isn't as clean as what some have posted it as, might i suggest that under the law canberra may have every right to stand their ground. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 250 (members: 0, guests: 250)