Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Porthoz, post: 2552937, member: 2221"] Are you really comparing a guy who is butt hurt about not getting the fullback position at the club, and was told by a senior player that he needs to get better to compete for said position, with a kid that wants to go home because he has a seriously ill father (regardless of being on the mend or not), is homesick and had a get out clause for those exact reasons, albeit possibly poorly worded? The only difference between Milford and Sticky is the wording of the clauses, with the Canberra management taking advantage of an unscrupulous **** like Sticky, while screwing a 19 y/old over with a clause they knew would be worthless when they put it in front of a 17 y/old kid, because if Milford's dad did get worse, no clause would be needed anyway if Milford wanted to go home, unless the Raiders wanted to ensure no kid would ever sign with them again! Fair dinkum, take the blinkers off mate! [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)