Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="subsbligh, post: 2576281, member: 1950"] From the NRL webpage: [COLOR=#333333][FONT=OpenSans-Regular]"The current ‘anti-tampering’ guidelines state that the NRL will not register a player’s contract with a new club until after Round Thirteen in the final year of that player’s existing contract with his current club. [B]The only exception to this is where the existing club agrees that the new contract should be registered." [/B][/FONT][/COLOR]The suggestion that the Broncos and Milford "contracted out" of the Round 13 deadline is a bit of a furphy, IMO. It's up to the NRL to decide whether or not to register the contract. The Broncos can't make the NRL register a contract. The only thing the Broncos and Milford could have done, IMO, was include some representations in the contract to each other that the contract was immediately binding notwithstanding registration couldn't be effected until Round 13. The fact the Raiders have presumably withheld consent is probably an indication of their intentions. They are still holding a flame. The Warriors gave consent in 2011 to the Roosters registering Maloney's contract for 2013 before the anti-tampering deadline. [COLOR=#333333][FONT=OpenSans-Regular][/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)